Stargate SG-1: 2001  » TV  »
4.5
1 votes
Are you familiar with this?
Feel free to rate it!
  • It's far better and more enjoyable in my opinion

    • by Orrymain
      TRUSTWORTHY

      all reviews
      In season 4 of Stargate SG-1, there was an episode called 2010 that I just didn’t like very much, reason being everyone was just so depressed with their lives. Season five gives us the precursor to that episode, though, and it’s called 2001. It’s far better and more enjoyable in my opinion.

      Stargate SG-1: 2001 is the episode when SG-1 makes


      contact with the Aschen. They have no clue about the race’s true motives for becoming an ally, but eventually, they figure it out.

      Sam does get to meet Joe, the Ambassador she actually married in 2010, and the sparks do fly. Joe’s best scene, though, is early on when he wears dress shoes to the farm planet, and the team just stares at him, knowing the shoes will be ruined.

      Daniel and Teal’c follow Hammond’s orders to find out more about the Aschen and their effect on the planet where they met them. To do so, Daniel takes some risks. This scene is funny to me in a way because Teal’c’s all worried about the place caving in, and Daniel just keeps ...


      • Stargate SG-1: 2001
      on going, making it clear he’ll even go back. It’s just funny because Daniel is supposed to be the scared geek and Teal’c the brave warrior, but so often, it’s Teal’c who whines about the danger while Daniel just goes about his job.

      Stargate SG-1: 2001 is a solid episode that has a good ending, if not a little weird in that Sam

      gets hurt, and her three strong he-men teammates just stare down at her. This has caused a lot of discussion, and the actors have all said it had something to do with camera angles and shots as to why they just stood there. Whatever the reason, it’s kinda funny that they really don’t express any concern over Sam at that moment.

      Good show though.




  • Don't Be Nice. Be Helpful.

The review was published as it's written by reviewer in March, 2009. The reviewer certified that no compensation was received from the reviewed item producer, trademark owner or any other institution, related with the item reviewed. The site is not responsible for the mistakes made. 101903637350531/k2311a0319/3.19.09
Your use of this website constitutes acceptance of the Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy