Nokia 2600  » Phones  »
3.5
1 votes
Are you familiar with this?
Feel free to rate it!
  • When Nokia 2600 went down in my hands, in beginning i think - foundation class telephones have returned finally, what does not look cheap and pitiful
  • Here yes, then, certainly, yet there were business class telephones (for example, popular and from flashbacks the non-flying Nokia 6210, classic telephones (for example, efficient the Nokia 6610 retained in a boring style and then, finally, foundation class telephones as, for example, Nokia 2100
  • This is also, in my opinion, turn point in the Nokia idea style, aspirations of its kind renew foundation class telephones, call them for classic telephones

    • by Arturs
      TRUSTWORTHY

      all reviews
      When Nokia 2600 went down in my hands, in beginning i think - foundation class telephones have returned finally, what does not look cheap and pitiful. I examined it close and on your own for a large surprise open, that it calls ‘Classic’. Unthink it is nothing bad, but this however in me induced known reflections. Maybe I catch changes, but allow me to offer a small digression in a recent history. Maybe someone remember classification of the Nokia telephones 5 years ago? Above all things, there were style telephones, which today find to the classics, for example, Nokia 7250. Secondly, there were the sportsmanlike telephones - maybe yet remember Nokia 5210.

      Third, there were multimedia telephones - the revolutionary crank Nokia 5510. Here yes, then, certainly, yet there were business class telephones (for example, popular and from flashbacks the non-flying Nokia 6210, classic telephones (for example, efficient


      the Nokia 6610 retained in a boring style and then, finally, foundation class telephones as, for example, Nokia 2100 . Today, entering in the Nokia web page, I see classification between classic, fold, move aside, turn, the large screen and with provided telephones of querty keyboards. What then are us to the classics? The correct answer - classic there is all. Main to the name to put Music Edition, Xpress music, Classic or Sport - and is clear that this is a classic sport telephone or classic (!) telephone.

      Clear that to classify telephones after 6 enough limited categories today it is not possible already. They already are not oriented only on the group of one users - ordinary users without high technological requirements, businessmen, which is necessary an elegant telephone with a package, youths, which is necessary music quality high of polite technologies, new successful representatives of gold young people, which important there is a telephone kind, not the technological package. This is also, in my opinion, turn point in the Nokia idea style, aspirations of its kind renew foundation class telephones, call them for classic telephones. Because, in the end of ends, which is against the classics? But which is for confession, that can realize its foundation necessitous only?

      If we talk for the use of this telephone, is seeing that a few businesses, which cheers pleasant, and also a few businesses, what reaches disappointment. Telephone is accessible simultaneous with two panels - dark blue and orange.

      As is generally known, a telephone corps is that, which wears out fastest and telephone loses its kind. Telephone in general in looks an aggregate …. polite. It, unlike the telephones of other producers, does not sin with it, that, only throwing an eye, becomes ...


      • Nokia 2600
      clear this category of prices. Even take in a hand, there is feeling, that it is made high-quality, keypad is not squeaky, there are not also fears, that they can fall out soon, also a screen is foundation of a very much decent quality, excuse me, telephone of the classic style.

      Disappointment Nr. 1 Telephone is slowly. Irritating appliques open slowly, similarly irritating they close them. Excuse me, but in 21 century it already is not OK! Certain a pair showed me new grey hairs, because it indeed slowly reacts on that, which wish from him to press out. Disappointment Nr.

      2 Radio, what is accessible in a telephone, is pitiful. It is very much uncomfortable in the use and very quiet. Being in an are, needs to strain one’s ears, that catch although a phrase from the song translated on radio. And so or so it is unsucceeded.

      Go me, that it is better to uninsert an unhigh-quality function, than to inlay such, what irritates with each use time.

      But radio ears were in correlation high-quality. A striking paradox. Disappointment Nr. 3 Keyboard is very much uncomfortable. A telephone is slippery, what from the point of design kinds look elegant.

      Disappointment Nr. 4 Screen is large, but it, in my opinion, is not utillized seizing useful. A few functions, for example, writing of reports, are stopped up how it at one time looked in some telephone with 2 displays of rows. Maybe Nokia tried to be innovative. Go me, that them this however much it has succeeded.

      Estimation of the mobile telephone Design a 4 Ergonomics 3 Possibilities (functions) 4 Middling 3,5 Verdict Nokia holds to its retained line, us not with what especially does not try to strike. But however, it is possible, so it is much better - quality is unchanging and even everyday. I think, Nokia have earned a medal for it, that does not lay cheap telephones to look pitiful.




more about
Nokia 2600
  • Don't Be Nice. Be Helpful.

The review was published as it's written by reviewer in March, 2008. The reviewer certified that no compensation was received from the reviewed item producer, trademark owner or any other institution, related with the item reviewed. The site is not responsible for the mistakes made. 371103314830531/k2311a0311/3.11.08
Your use of this website constitutes acceptance of the Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy