Flesh for Frankenstein movie  » Movies  »
1 votes
Are you familiar with this?
Feel free to rate it!
  • I know this is something of a cult favorite, but in my opinion, it's never funny or artsy, only bad

    • by limonar
      all reviews
      This is supposed to be a more artsy depiction of Mary Shelley’s classic novel. Paul Morrissey, perhaps the weirdest filmmaker ever, directed this.

      It stars Udo Kier as dr

      Frankenstein, the rest are mostly amateurs.

      I don’t know if I would call this film artsy, but it certainly was disgusting in every possible way.

      It shows so much ...

      • gore and nudity mixed together that I was feeling sick afterwards.

        I know this is something of a cult favorite, but in my opinion, it’s never funny or artsy,

        only bad.

        The acting is shockingly bad, even from the otherwise great Udo Kier.

        And it’s nothing more than a stupid experiment that totally failed.

        No feeling at all, only disgusting.


  • Sidenotes
    • Don't Be Nice. Be Helpful.
    The review was published as it's written by reviewer in November, 2005. The reviewer certified that no compensation was received from the reviewed item producer, trademark owner or any other institution, related with the item reviewed. The site is not responsible for the mistakes made. 11281120170630/k2311a1128/11.28.05
    Your use of this website constitutes acceptance of the Terms & Conditions
    Privacy Policy